Kunst v. Department of State

41 A.D.2d 686, 342 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5119
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 1973·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Petition granted and determination unanimously annulled with costs. Memorandum: The petitioner’s license as a real estate broker has been revoked pursuant to section 442-c of the Real Property Law based upon evidence that his salesman, Frawley, violated, the rules of the Department of State (19 NYCRR 175.8) by selling property subject to the exclusive listing contract of another broker. The evidence contained in the record does not support a finding that petitioner had actual knowledge of Frawley’s misconduct and no other finding was made by the hearing officer which would impose responsibility upon petitioner for his salesman’s misconduct under the statute. (Review of determination revoking broker’s licehse transferred by Order of Onondaga Special Term.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Moule, Cardamone and Simons, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kunst v. Department of State, 41 A.D.2d 686, 342 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

41 A.D.2d 686 (Kunst v. Department of State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Geisler v. Department of State
73 A.D.2d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)