Kunmann v. Kunmann

551 So. 2d 598, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2573, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6159, 1989 WL 133053
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 8, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2257
StatusPublished

This text of 551 So. 2d 598 (Kunmann v. Kunmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kunmann v. Kunmann, 551 So. 2d 598, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2573, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6159, 1989 WL 133053 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as the marital assets were nominal at best, it is our view that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the wife’s claim for equitable distribution and we affirm as to this issue.

We reverse, as an abuse of discretion, in light of the gross disparity in the financial circumstances of the parties, the denial of the wife’s claim for attorney’s fees and remand for an adjudication and an award of reasonable attorney’s fees to the wife’s counsel.1

[599]*599AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 So. 2d 598, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2573, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6159, 1989 WL 133053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kunmann-v-kunmann-fladistctapp-1989.