Kunle v. Magee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kunle v. Magee

240 A.D. 976

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Order [977]*977directing that judgment in favor of plaintiff be marked “ Paid and Satisfied ” reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to Special Term to take proof upon the issue of whether or not tAe judgment was satisfied, the issue to be whether cash and note were accepted in satisfaction or conditionally. We are of opinion that the issue was one which should not have been determined upon conflicting affidavits. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order [977]*977directing that judgment in favor of plaintiff be marked “ Paid and Satisfied ” reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to Special Term to take proof upon the issue of whether or not tAe judgment was satisfied, the issue to be whether cash and note were accepted in satisfaction or conditionally. We are of opinion that the issue was one which should not have been determined upon conflicting affidavits. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Kunle v. Magee, 240 A.D. 976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 976 (Kunle v. Magee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.