Kunis v. Sears Roebuck Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kunis v. Sears Roebuck Co.

59 A.D.2d 818, 399 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 818 (Kunis v. Sears Roebuck Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kunis v. Sears Roebuck Co., 59 A.D.2d 818, 399 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed October 24, 1975, which reversed various decisions of a referee and held that the claimant-widow was entitled to neither compensation nor death benefits. The board found that decedent’s death: "was due to the natural progression of his underlying heart disease and not causally related to an industrial accident. The evidence in the record does not indicate a single event which precipitated the heart attack and subsequent death on October 5, 1972.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed October 24, 1975, which reversed various decisions of a referee and held that the claimant-widow was entitled to neither compensation nor death benefits. The board found that decedent’s death: "was due to the natural progression of his underlying heart disease and not causally related to an industrial accident. The evidence in the record does not indicate a single event which precipitated the heart attack and subsequent death on October 5, 1972.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 818, 399 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kunis-v-sears-roebuck-co-nyappdiv-1977.