Kuniholm v. Kuniholm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kuniholm v. Kuniholm

15 A.D.2d 736, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11759

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 1962·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied but motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “ Did the Appellate Division err in affirming the order of Special Term denying plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice?” Settle order on notice. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied but motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “ Did the Appellate Division err in affirming the order of Special Term denying plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice?” Settle order on notice. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Kuniholm v. Kuniholm, 15 A.D.2d 736, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

15 A.D.2d 736 (Kuniholm v. Kuniholm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.