KUNFERMAN v. Ford Motor Company

694 N.W.2d 783, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 210, 2005 WL 914204
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 19, 2005
DocketA05-92
StatusPublished

This text of 694 N.W.2d 783 (KUNFERMAN v. Ford Motor Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
KUNFERMAN v. Ford Motor Company, 694 N.W.2d 783, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 210, 2005 WL 914204 (Mich. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 16, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
694 N.W.2d 783, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 210, 2005 WL 914204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kunferman-v-ford-motor-company-minn-2005.