Kundinger v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
This text of 16 N.W. 330 (Kundinger v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question in this case is whether the evidence in the case conclusively made out negligence ■on the part of plaintiff contributing to the injury of which he complains. Unless it did, he was entitled to recover. "We find, on examination, that there was evidence of such [186]*186negligence, and also evidence of dne care; and the question-having been decided on the facts in plaintiffs favor, the finding is conclusive, and no question of law arises for decision now.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 N.W. 330, 51 Mich. 185, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kundinger-v-detroit-grand-haven-milwaukee-railway-co-mich-1883.