Kundinger v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.

16 N.W. 330, 51 Mich. 185, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 560
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 1883·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question in this case is whether the evidence in the case conclusively made out negligence ■on the part of plaintiff contributing to the injury of which he complains. Unless it did, he was entitled to recover. "We find, on examination, that there was evidence of such [186] negligence, and also evidence of dne care; and the question-having been decided on the facts in plaintiffs favor, the finding is conclusive, and no question of law arises for decision now.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kundinger v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co., 16 N.W. 330, 51 Mich. 185, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 560 (Mich. 1883).

16 N.W. 330 (Kundinger v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lynch v. Grayson
5 N.M. 487 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1891)
Neumann v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.
23 N.W. 600 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1885)