Kuncio v. Millard Fillmore Hospital
This text of 91 A.D.2d 1179 (Kuncio v. Millard Fillmore Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum decision at malpractice term, Gossel, J. We add only that the [1180]*1180rule of Bing v Thunig (2 NY2d 656) which abrogated the doctrine of charitable immunity, was correctly retroactively applied (Keane v Sloan Kettering Inst. for Cancer Research, 68 AD2d 901; see, also, Toth v Community Hosp. at Glen Cove, 22 NY2d 255; Burton v Brooklyn Doctors Hosp., 88 AD2d 217; O’Neill v Montefiore Hosp., 11 AD2d 132) without impairment of defendant’s due process rights (see Gurnee v Aetna Life & Cas. Co., 55 NY2d 184). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.D.2d 1179, 459 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuncio-v-millard-fillmore-hospital-nyappdiv-1983.