Kun v. Berkeley County Government

32 F. App'x 689
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 2002
DocketNo. 01-2302
StatusPublished

This text of 32 F. App'x 689 (Kun v. Berkeley County Government) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kun v. Berkeley County Government, 32 F. App'x 689 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wieh George Kun appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellee on his race and sex discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kun v. Berkeley County Gov’t, No. CA-00-790-2-18 (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 F. App'x 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kun-v-berkeley-county-government-ca4-2002.