Kun v. Berkeley County Government

Fourth Circuit

Kun v. Berkeley County Government

32 F. App'x 689

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 17, 2002·No. No. 01-2302·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wieh George Kun appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellee on his race and sex discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kun v. Berkeley County Gov’t, No. CA-00-790-2-18 (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Wieh George Kun appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellee on his race and sex discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kun v. Berkeley County Gov’t, No. CA-00-790-2-18 (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Kun v. Berkeley County Government, 32 F. App'x 689 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

32 F. App'x 689 (Kun v. Berkeley County Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related