Kumpe v. Hall
145 S.E. 509, 167 Ga. 284, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 141
Opinion
The court did not err in remanding the prisoner to the custody of the sheriff. A substantia] compliance with the provisions of the Penal Code (1910), §§ 904, 906, with reference to affidavits and war[285]*285rants for the arrest of offenders against the penal laws, and the form of such warrants, is all that is required. Williams v. State, 107 Ga. 693, 694 (33 S. E. 641); Brown v. State, 109 Ga. 570 (2) (34 S. E. 1031); Kansas v. White, 76 Kan. 654 (92 Pac. 820, 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 556). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kumpe v. Hall, 145 S.E. 509, 167 Ga. 284, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 141 (Ga. 1928).
145 S.E. 509 (Kumpe v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blair v. State
197 S.E.2d 362 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Lovett v. State
141 S.E.2d 595 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Cain v. Kendrick
33 S.E.2d 883 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Cain v. Kendrick
33 S.E.2d 417 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)