Kumbartzki v. Kumbartzki

38 A.D.2d 824, 329 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5266
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 28, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 A.D.2d 824 (Kumbartzki v. Kumbartzki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kumbartzki v. Kumbartzki, 38 A.D.2d 824, 329 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on January 3, 1972, dismissing complaint of husband plaintiff in an action for divorce, and award[825]*825ing custody of child to wife defendant, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of deleting custody award, and remitting the matter to Special Term for the purpose of more extensive testimony in depth, directed to the sole issue of custody, i.e., the relative fitness of the parents and the ultimate welfare of the child; and, as so modified, the judgment affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Pending the determination to be made by Special Term, the stay heretofore granted by McNally, J. is to continue. In view of the above disposition, the appeal from the order entered December 2, 1971, is unanimously dismissd as academic, without costs and without disbursements. In remitting the matter, we rely also on the representations of counsel on oral argument that both will welcome the good offices of the Family Counsel-ling Unit, which is hereby requested to make relevant investigation and inquiry, with due diligence, and to make use of such psychological, psychiatric or medical assistance as in its judgment may be helpful. One of the difficulties in reviewing the present record is the inconclusive quality of the evidence as to alleged injuries suffered by this infant and the cause thereof. In respect to this crucial issue the expertise of the Family Counselling Unit is indicated. Concur — Stevens, P. J., McGivern, Kupferman and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Granato v. Occhipinti
602 P.2d 442 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1979)
Doe v. Doe
86 Misc. 194 (NYC Family Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.2d 824, 329 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kumbartzki-v-kumbartzki-nyappdiv-1972.