Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Kumar v. Richmond

Kumar v. Richmond

34 So. 3d 197, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6232, 2010 WL 1794160
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 2010·No. 1D09-5720·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

Appellee Darlene Richmond’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See § 440.25(5)(c), Fla. Stat. (2009); Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Proudfoot, 116 So.2d 245, 247 (Fla.1959); Mac hin v. Lumber Transp., Inc., 556 So.2d 446, 447 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

HAWKES, C.J., WETHERELL and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kumar v. Richmond, 34 So. 3d 197, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6232, 2010 WL 1794160 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

34 So. 3d 197 (Kumar v. Richmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colson v. State
34 So. 3d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)