Kumar v. Garland
This text of 125 F.4th 1289 (Kumar v. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SANDEEP KUMAR, No. 23-308 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-274-852 v. ORDER MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
Before: Evan J. Wallach,* Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges.
Filed January 17, 2025
Order
* The Honorable Evan J. Wallach, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. 2 KUMAR V. GARLAND
SUMMARY**
Immigration
The panel issued an order withdrawing the opinion and dissent filed on August 2, 2024; replacing it with a memorandum disposition and dissent; and denying as moot a petition for panel rehearing.
The opinion filed on August 2, 2024 (Dkt. No. 22) and published at 110 F.4th 1149 (2024), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent to any court. A memorandum disposition resolving this matter will be filed concurrently with this order. The memorandum disposition reflects the following changes to the withdrawn opinion:
On page 6, lines 9–10, delete:
** This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader. KUMAR V. GARLAND 3
On page 12, lines 12–13, delete:
The petition for panel rehearing (Dkt. No. 27), filed on October 16, 2024, is denied as moot. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 F.4th 1289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kumar-v-garland-ca9-2025.