Kumar v. Garland

125 F.4th 1289
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 2025
Docket23-308
StatusPublished

This text of 125 F.4th 1289 (Kumar v. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kumar v. Garland, 125 F.4th 1289 (9th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDEEP KUMAR, No. 23-308 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-274-852 v. ORDER MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

Before: Evan J. Wallach,* Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges.

Filed January 17, 2025

Order

* The Honorable Evan J. Wallach, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. 2 KUMAR V. GARLAND

SUMMARY**

Immigration

The panel issued an order withdrawing the opinion and dissent filed on August 2, 2024; replacing it with a memorandum disposition and dissent; and denying as moot a petition for panel rehearing.

The opinion filed on August 2, 2024 (Dkt. No. 22) and published at 110 F.4th 1149 (2024), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent to any court. A memorandum disposition resolving this matter will be filed concurrently with this order. The memorandum disposition reflects the following changes to the withdrawn opinion:

On page 6, lines 9–10, delete: On page 12, lines 10–11, delete:

** This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader. KUMAR V. GARLAND 3

On page 12, lines 12–13, delete:

The petition for panel rehearing (Dkt. No. 27), filed on October 16, 2024, is denied as moot. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kumar v. Garland
110 F.4th 1149 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 F.4th 1289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kumar-v-garland-ca9-2025.