Kumar Chettri v. Loretta E. Lynch

Ninth Circuit

Kumar Chettri v. Loretta E. Lynch

650 F. App'x 323

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 16, 2016

Docket11-73672

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 650 F. App'x 323 (Kumar Chettri v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kumar Chettri v. Loretta E. Lynch, 650 F. App'x 323 (9th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Kumar Chettri appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and we deny the petition.

The BIA denied Chettri’s motion to reopen because his prior attempts to obtain asylum using false information undermined *324 his credibility and because his motion contained inconsistencies that undermined his claims. Because we cannot say that the BIA’s decision was “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law,” its denial of the motion to reopen is affirmed. Go v. Holder, 744 F.3d 604, 609 (9th Cir.2014).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI