Kulp v. Snyder
This text of 94 F. 613 (Kulp v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The special plea of the statute of limitations is prohibited in any action ex delicto by the procedure act of Pennsylvania of May 25, 1887. But this act is not to be applied by this court to eases where congress has legislated, and upon the subject of pleadings congress has legislated in section 4920 of the Revised Statutes, under which it seems that defenses other than those there enumerated may be pleaded specially, with as well as without the general issue. See notes to Rob. Pat. § 992. Moreover, the question sought to be raised does not appear to be of any practical importance. If the defendant is entitled to the benefit of the statute, and if, upon the whole evidence, it shall appear that the plaintiff has a valid cause of action which accrued within six years, he will be entitled to recover; otherwise, he wall not be. This can readily be determined as a single issue upon a single trial, and the tendency of the courts at this day is to regard with disfavor the interposition of inconsequential points of technical pleading. The plaintiffs rule to strike off the defendant’s pleas, etc., is discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 F. 613, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kulp-v-snyder-circtedpa-1899.