Kullman v. Camerma

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kullman v. Camerma

187 Misc. 966, 68 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3373

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 12, 1946·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The landlords made out a prima facie case under paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of section 6 of the Rent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (11 Federal Register 11668), when they proved that they wanted the premises for the use and occupancy of the father and mother of the landlord Marita Kullman (Moak v. Mehlman, 185 Misc. 992).

The final order should be reversed upon the law, and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to the landlords to abide the event.

MacCrate, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The landlords made out a prima facie case under paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of section 6 of the Rent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (11 Federal Register 11668), when they proved that they wanted the premises for the use and occupancy of the father and mother of the landlord Marita Kullman (Moak v. Mehlman, 185 Misc. 992).

The final order should be reversed upon the law, and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to the landlords to abide the event.

MacCrate, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Kullman v. Camerma, 187 Misc. 966, 68 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

187 Misc. 966 (Kullman v. Camerma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related