Kullman v. Camerma

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kullman v. Camerma

187 Misc. 966, 68 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3373

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1946

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 187 Misc. 966 (Kullman v. Camerma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kullman v. Camerma, 187 Misc. 966, 68 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The landlords made out a prima facie case under paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of section 6 of the Rent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (11 Federal Register 11668), when they proved that they wanted the premises for the use and occupancy of the father and mother of the landlord Marita Kullman (Moak v. Mehlman, 185 Misc. 992).

The final order should be reversed upon the law, and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to the landlords to abide the event.

MacCrate, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI