Kuller v. Potashner

268 A.D.2d 563, 702 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 944
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 31, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated November 24, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

After the defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether any repairs made by the defendants to the subject sidewalk caused or contributed to her trip and fall (see generally, Capobianco v Mari, 267 AD2d 191; see, Witte v Incorporated Vil. of Port Washington N., 114 AD2d 359). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuller v. Potashner, 268 A.D.2d 563, 702 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

268 A.D.2d 563 (Kuller v. Potashner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zhilkina v. City of New York
121 A.D.3d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Leggio v. County of Nassau
281 A.D.2d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Witherspoon v. Thomas
281 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)