Kulisch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Kulisch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

651 A.2d 263, 231 Conn. 938, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 417

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 17, 1994·No. SC 15126·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 141 (AC 13620) is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does the retroactive application of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, to the facts of this case violate article first, § 10, of the United States constitution?

“2. If the answer to question 1. is no, does the retroactive application of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, to the [939] facts of this case violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution?”

Decided November 17, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15126.* Rodd J. Mantell, in support of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 141 (AC 13620) is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does the retroactive application of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, to the facts of this case violate article first, § 10, of the United States constitution?

“2. If the answer to question 1. is no, does the retroactive application of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, to the [939] facts of this case violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution?”

Decided November 17, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15126.* Rodd J. Mantell, in support of the petition.

Kulisch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 651 A.2d 263, 231 Conn. 938, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 417 (Colo. 1994).

Pincite

651 A.2d 263 (Kulisch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related