Kulisch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
651 A.2d 263, 231 Conn. 938, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 417
This text of 651 A.2d 263 (Kulisch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kulisch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 651 A.2d 263, 231 Conn. 938, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 417 (Colo. 1994).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 141 (AC 13620) is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Does the retroactive application of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, to the facts of this case violate article first, § 10, of the United States constitution?
“2. If the answer to question 1. is no, does the retroactive application of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, to the [939]*939facts of this case violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kulisch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
648 A.2d 890 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
651 A.2d 263, 231 Conn. 938, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kulisch-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-conn-1994.