Kulikowski v. Roslyn Savings Bank

504 N.E.2d 691, 69 N.Y.2d 705, 512 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 21311
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 1986·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that movant has failed to comply with section 500.11 (d) (1) (C) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]) (see also, CPLR 5611).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kulikowski v. Roslyn Savings Bank, 504 N.E.2d 691, 69 N.Y.2d 705, 512 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 21311 (N.Y. 1986).

504 N.E.2d 691 (Kulikowski v. Roslyn Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fusco v. Barnwell House of Tires, Inc.
2004 NY Slip Op 50490(U) (New York Supreme Court, Suffolk County, 2004)
Rivera v. United States
994 F. Supp. 406 (E.D. New York, 1998)
Soanes v. Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield
970 F. Supp. 230 (S.D. New York, 1997)
Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
641 A.2d 783 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Berger v. Manhattan Life Insurance
805 F. Supp. 1097 (S.D. New York, 1992)