Kulikowski v. Reiter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kulikowski v. Reiter

264 A.D. 784, 34 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4725

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 784 (Kulikowski v. Reiter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kulikowski v. Reiter, 264 A.D. 784, 34 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant, in an action for personal injuries and property damage, appeals from a judgment [785]*785in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $7,637.50, entered upon a jury verdict in the amount of $7,450. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless within tern, days from the entry of the order hereon the plaintiff stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict rendered in Ms favor to $4,043.56, in wMch event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The verdict is excessive to the extent indicated. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant, in an action for personal injuries and property damage, appeals from a judgment [785]*785in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $7,637.50, entered upon a jury verdict in the amount of $7,450. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless within tern, days from the entry of the order hereon the plaintiff stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict rendered in Ms favor to $4,043.56, in wMch event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The verdict is excessive to the extent indicated. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., coneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 784, 34 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kulikowski-v-reiter-nyappdiv-1942.