Kulikowski v. Reiter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kulikowski v. Reiter

264 A.D. 784, 34 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4725

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 1942·Published

Opinion

Defendant, in an action for personal injuries and property damage, appeals from a judgment [785]*785in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $7,637.50, entered upon a jury verdict in the amount of $7,450. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless within tern, days from the entry of the order hereon the plaintiff stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict rendered in Ms favor to $4,043.56, in wMch event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The verdict is excessive to the extent indicated. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant, in an action for personal injuries and property damage, appeals from a judgment [785]*785in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $7,637.50, entered upon a jury verdict in the amount of $7,450. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless within tern, days from the entry of the order hereon the plaintiff stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict rendered in Ms favor to $4,043.56, in wMch event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The verdict is excessive to the extent indicated. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., coneur.

Kulikowski v. Reiter, 264 A.D. 784, 34 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

264 A.D. 784 (Kulikowski v. Reiter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.