Kuligowski v. McCullough

137 A. 437, 103 N.J.L. 700, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 253
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 16, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 137 A. 437 (Kuligowski v. McCullough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kuligowski v. McCullough, 137 A. 437, 103 N.J.L. 700, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 253 (N.J. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Lloyd, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 5.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Campbell, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, JJ. 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 A. 437, 103 N.J.L. 700, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuligowski-v-mccullough-nj-1927.