Kulig v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kulig v. State

878 So. 2d 457, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10829, 2004 WL 1621632

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 21, 2004·No. No. 4D04-2212·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In Hernandez-Molina v. State, 860 So.2d 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (en banc), this court held that the legislation authorizing the mandatory minimum terms associated with various crimes including trafficking, was not enacted in violation of the single subject rule. See Ch. 99-188, Laws of Fla. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion. Again, we certify conflict with the second district’s decision in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002), and the fifth district’s decision in Jones v. State, 872 So.2d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (on rehearing en banc).

WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In Hernandez-Molina v. State, 860 So.2d 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (en banc), this court held that the legislation authorizing the mandatory minimum terms associated with various crimes including trafficking, was not enacted in violation of the single subject rule. See Ch. 99-188, Laws of Fla. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion. Again, we certify conflict with the second district’s decision in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002), and the fifth district’s decision in Jones v. State, 872 So.2d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (on rehearing en banc).

WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Kulig v. State, 878 So. 2d 457, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10829, 2004 WL 1621632 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

878 So. 2d 457 (Kulig v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related