Kuliarchar Sea Foods (Cox's Bazar) Ltd. v. Soleil Chartered Bank

2019 NY Slip Op 73
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 8, 2019·No. 8041 654930/17·Published

Opinion

Kuliarchar Sea Foods (Cox's Bazar) Ltd. v Soleil Chartered Bank (2019 NY Slip Op 00073)
Kuliarchar Sea Foods (Cox's Bazar) Ltd. v Soleil Chartered Bank
2019 NY Slip Op 00073
Decided on January 8, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 8, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Tom, Mazzarelli, Webber, JJ.

8041 654930/17

[*1]Kuliarchar Sea Foods (Cox's Bazar) Ltd., Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Soleil Chartered Bank, et al., Defendants-Appellants.


Peyrot & Associates, P.C., New York (David C. Van Leeuwen of counsel), for appellants.

Freiberger Haber LLP, Melville (Jeffrey M. Haber of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), entered April 6, 2018, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied those branches of defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, and as against defendants Soleil Capitale Corporation (Soleil Capitale) and Govind Srivastava, on the grounds of a defense founded upon documentary evidence and failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Supreme Court properly held that, at this stage of the litigation, plaintiff's complaint sufficiently alleges facts which state a claim against Soleil Capitale and Srivastava so as to pierce defendant Soleil Chartered Bank (SCB)'s corporate veil and hold Soleil Capitale and Srivastava liable as alter egos of SCB, and that defendants' documentary evidence fails to conclusively refute these allegations (see Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin., 82 NY2d 135, 141-142 [1993]; Shisgal v Brown, 21 AD3d 845, 848 [1st Dept 2005]). That branch of the motion which was to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was also properly denied (see generally Daimler AG v Bauman, 571 US 117 [2014]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 8, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuliarchar Sea Foods (Cox's Bazar) Ltd. v. Soleil Chartered Bank, 2019 NY Slip Op 73 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

2019 NY Slip Op 73 (Kuliarchar Sea Foods (Cox's Bazar) Ltd. v. Soleil Chartered Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance
623 N.E.2d 1157 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Daimler AG v. Bauman
134 S. Ct. 746 (Supreme Court, 2014)
Shisgal v. Brown
21 A.D.3d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)