Kuletsky v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kuletsky v. Selsky

41 A.D.3d 1124, 837 N.Y.S.2d 598

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 A.D.3d 1124 (Kuletsky v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kuletsky v. Selsky, 41 A.D.3d 1124, 837 N.Y.S.2d 598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules following a tier III disciplinary hearing. On administrative appeal, three of the charges were dismissed, leaving only that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of possessing contraband. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination. The Attorney General has advised that the determination has since been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Given that petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Adams v Goord, 32 AD3d 644, 645 [2006]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules following a tier III disciplinary hearing. On administrative appeal, three of the charges were dismissed, leaving only that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of possessing contraband. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination. The Attorney General has advised that the determination has since been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Given that petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Adams v Goord, 32 AD3d 644, 645 [2006]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.3d 1124, 837 N.Y.S.2d 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuletsky-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack