Kula v. United States
This text of Kula v. United States (Kula v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1331
FRANK S. KULA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00114-REM-JES)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank S. Kula, Appellant Pro Se. Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Frank S. Kula appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kula v.
United States, No. 3:07-cv-00114-REM-JES (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 28,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kula v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kula-v-united-states-ca4-2009.