Kula v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

664 N.E.2d 892, 87 N.Y.2d 953, 641 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 231
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 15, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 664 N.E.2d 892 (Kula v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kula v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 664 N.E.2d 892, 87 N.Y.2d 953, 641 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 231 (N.Y. 1996).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint and to add a party, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 N.E.2d 892, 87 N.Y.2d 953, 641 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kula-v-state-farm-fire-casualty-co-ny-1996.