Kula v. Kula

146 N.W.2d 384, 180 Neb. 893, 1966 Neb. LEXIS 625
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 1966·No. No. 36469·Published·Cited by 30 cases

Opinion

McCown, J.

The defendant and appellee has filed a motion in this court for an order requiring the plaintiff and appellant to surrender possession of a dwelling in accordance with the final decree of the district court in a divorce action. Although the case is now pending on appeal in this court, no supersedeas was filed. The appeal, therefore, does not operate as a stay of proceedings. The district court has jurisdiction and may enforce the award as in the case of any other nonsuperseded judgment. See Hall v. Hall, 176 Neb. 555, 126 N. W. 2d 839. The motion is therefore denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kula v. Kula, 146 N.W.2d 384, 180 Neb. 893, 1966 Neb. LEXIS 625 (Neb. 1966).

146 N.W.2d 384 (Kula v. Kula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGill Restoration v. Lion Place Condo. Assn.
986 N.W.2d 32 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2023)
In re Change of Name of Whilde
298 Neb. 510 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2017)
Kricsfeld v. Kricsfeld
588 N.W.2d 210 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1999)