Kuhs v. Flower City Tissue Mills Co.
190 A.D. 931
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kuhs v. Flower City Tissue Mills Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 189 A.D. 539 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1919·Published
Opinion
Motion to amend 11th finding of fact denied. We are of the opinion that no amendment is necessary, for the reason that under the authority of City of Buffalo v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co. (190 N. Y. 84) and cases there cited, if there are inconsistent findings, the plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of the finding most favorable to him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kuhs v. Flower City Tissue Mills Co., 190 A.D. 931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).
190 A.D. 931 (Kuhs v. Flower City Tissue Mills Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Buffalo v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
82 N.E. 513 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)