Kuhnke v. Borden

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Kuhnke v. Borden

137 N.W. 769, 150 Wis. 526, 1912 Wisc. LEXIS 227

DecidedOctober 8, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 137 N.W. 769 (Kuhnke v. Borden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kuhnke v. Borden, 137 N.W. 769, 150 Wis. 526, 1912 Wisc. LEXIS 227 (Wis. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Winslow, O. J.

There was ample evidence in support of the findings of fact of the trial court, hence the judgment must be affirmed, unless there was some prejudicial error in the-'admission of evidence or other rulings on the trial, as a result of which some substantial right of the plaintiff has been affected.

. A number of rulings are attacked by the appellant as erroneous and substantially prejudicial, but after careful examination we do not deem any of these claims well founded or of sufficient importance to justify treatment in detail.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winslow, O. J.

There was ample evidence in support of the findings of fact of the trial court, hence the judgment must be affirmed, unless there was some prejudicial error in the-'admission of evidence or other rulings on the trial, as a result of which some substantial right of the plaintiff has been affected.

. A number of rulings are attacked by the appellant as erroneous and substantially prejudicial, but after careful examination we do not deem any of these claims well founded or of sufficient importance to justify treatment in detail.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 N.W. 769, 150 Wis. 526, 1912 Wisc. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuhnke-v-borden-wis-1912.