Kuhnen v. Blitz

Illinois Supreme Court

Kuhnen v. Blitz

56 Ill. 171

DecidedSeptember 15, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 56 Ill. 171 (Kuhnen v. Blitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kuhnen v. Blitz, 56 Ill. 171 (Ill. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Although we entertain some doubt as to the correctness of this verdict, we find no legal grounds in the record for reversing the judgment. The law governing the case was stated to the jury with entire correctness. The instructions refused for the defendant, so far as they were correct, were fully embodied in those given. The evidence is so nearly balanced that we cannot say the verdict was clearly against its weight. We must affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Although we entertain some doubt as to the correctness of this verdict, we find no legal grounds in the record for reversing the judgment. The law governing the case was stated to the jury with entire correctness. The instructions refused for the defendant, so far as they were correct, were fully embodied in those given. The evidence is so nearly balanced that we cannot say the verdict was clearly against its weight. We must affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Ill. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuhnen-v-blitz-ill-1870.