Kuhnel v. Bierbrauer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Kuhnel v. Bierbrauer

99 N.W. 1135, 122 Wis. 307, 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 167

DecidedJune 10, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 99 N.W. 1135 (Kuhnel v. Bierbrauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kuhnel v. Bierbrauer, 99 N.W. 1135, 122 Wis. 307, 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 167 (Wis. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

WiNslow, J.

This is a companion case with the case of Bierbrauer v. Kuhnel, ante, p. 306, 99 N. W. 1018, and was tried and decided upon the same evidence. The action was brought to recover back certain payments which the plaintiffs had made to the defendant upon the well-drilling contract involved in the other case during the progress of the drilling, on the ground of entire failure of consideration. The findings as to the failure to complete the well and the fact that it was of no value were the same in the present case as in the other case, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs for the recovery back of said payments. The parties stipulated in writing that if the other case be affirmed on the merits this case should also be affirmed. The judgment in the present case must therefore be affirmed.

By the Court. — It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WiNslow, J.

This is a companion case with the case of Bierbrauer v. Kuhnel, ante, p. 306, 99 N. W. 1018, and was tried and decided upon the same evidence. The action was brought to recover back certain payments which the plaintiffs had made to the defendant upon the well-drilling contract involved in the other case during the progress of the drilling, on the ground of entire failure of consideration. The findings as to the failure to complete the well and the fact that it was of no value were the same in the present case as in the other case, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs for the recovery back of said payments. The parties stipulated in writing that if the other case be affirmed on the merits this case should also be affirmed. The judgment in the present case must therefore be affirmed.

By the Court. — It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 N.W. 1135, 122 Wis. 307, 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuhnel-v-bierbrauer-wis-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack