Kuhne v. Gescheidt
28 N.Y.S. 1113, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 883
This text of 28 N.Y.S. 1113 (Kuhne v. Gescheidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kuhne v. Gescheidt, 28 N.Y.S. 1113, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 883 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
Opinion
This was an action upon a written instrument in the nature of a mortgage upon real property, containing an express covenant to pay. There was no question to submit to the jury, and the court, properly directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 N.Y.S. 1113, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuhne-v-gescheidt-nysupct-1894.