Kuhn v. Telford

98 So. 2d 85
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 8, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 98 So. 2d 85 (Kuhn v. Telford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kuhn v. Telford, 98 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 3.9(c) of the rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the. judgment is

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., HOBSON, THORN-AL, and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. WIGGINTON, District Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kuhn v. Telford
115 So. 2d 36 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. State Road Dept.
98 So. 2d 85 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 2d 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuhn-v-telford-fla-1957.