Kuhn v. State
This text of 29 S.W. 272 (Kuhn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a conviction of selling liquor to a minor. He only excepted to the charge of the court because it instructed the jury it devolved upon him to prove he had the proper written consent to sell liquor to such minor, the sale being knowingly made. The exception was not valid. Reynolds v. The State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 36. Appellant’s requested instruction, though abstractly correct, was properly refused, because it had no application to the case. He did not adduce in evidence written consent from either parent authorizing the sale to the minor.
The judgment is fully sustained by the testimony, and is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Judges all present and concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 S.W. 272, 34 Tex. Crim. 85, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuhn-v-state-texcrimapp-1895.