Kuhlman v. Grimminger
350 N.W.2d 24, 217 Neb. 769, 1984 Neb. LEXIS 1137
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kuhlman v. Grimminger. Read the opinion of the Court — 213 Neb. 64 →
Opinion
We have reviewed this matter de novo on the record and have found no error concerning the judgment of the district court. Appellee’s request for an attorney fee in the cross-appeal is denied. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kuhlman v. Grimminger, 350 N.W.2d 24, 217 Neb. 769, 1984 Neb. LEXIS 1137 (Neb. 1984).
350 N.W.2d 24 (Kuhlman v. Grimminger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.