Kuhl v. Hintze
This text of 246 A.D. 694 (Kuhl v. Hintze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, so far as appealed from, denying defendant’s motion for a separate trial of the equitable issues raised by defendant’s affirmative defense and counterclaim in the amended answer and plaintiff’s reply thereto, and denying a stay of issues raised by complaint and answer, unanimously modified by granting separate trial of the equitable issues raised by the defense and counterclaim in the amended answer and the reply thereto, after and without prejudice to the trial of the plaintiff’s claim and the entry of judgment, if any, thereon, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuhl-v-hintze-nyappdiv-1935.