Kugel v. Riedell
160 A. 695, 109 N.J.L. 268, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 326
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -Pabkee, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Donges, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kugel v. Riedell, 160 A. 695, 109 N.J.L. 268, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 326 (N.J. 1932).
160 A. 695 (Kugel v. Riedell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.