Kuflick v. Glasser

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kuflick v. Glasser

114 N.Y.S. 870

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 114 N.Y.S. 870 (Kuflick v. Glasser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kuflick v. Glasser, 114 N.Y.S. 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

This is an action on two checks made by the defendants to the order of the plaintiffs. No evidence was offered to show that notice of dishonor was given to the drawers of the checks. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the plaintiffs “have failed to establish a cause of action.” In the absence of evidence that notice of dishonor was given to the drawers, the proof was insufficient to sustain a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Negotiable Instrument Law (Laws 1897, p. 739, c. 613, § 160); Ewald [871]*871v. Faulhaber Stable Co., 55 Misc. Rep. 275, 105 N. Y. Supp. 114; Scanlon v. Wallach, 53 Misc. Rep. 104, 102 N. Y. Supp. 1090, affirmed 126 App. Div. 913,110 N. Y. Supp. 1144.

The defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint was sufficient to entitle them to the benefit of the exception which they took to the denial of that motion.

The judgment and order appealed from are reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

This is an action on two checks made by the defendants to the order of the plaintiffs. No evidence was offered to show that notice of dishonor was given to the drawers of the checks. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the plaintiffs “have failed to establish a cause of action.” In the absence of evidence that notice of dishonor was given to the drawers, the proof was insufficient to sustain a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Negotiable Instrument Law (Laws 1897, p. 739, c. 613, § 160); Ewald [871]*871v. Faulhaber Stable Co., 55 Misc. Rep. 275, 105 N. Y. Supp. 114; Scanlon v. Wallach, 53 Misc. Rep. 104, 102 N. Y. Supp. 1090, affirmed 126 App. Div. 913,110 N. Y. Supp. 1144.

The defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint was sufficient to entitle them to the benefit of the exception which they took to the denial of that motion.

The judgment and order appealed from are reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 N.Y.S. 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuflick-v-glasser-nyappterm-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack