Kuehne v. State

182 S.W.3d 266, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 74, 2006 WL 162700
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 24, 2006·No. WD 64543·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Kuehne appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for relief from his convictions by a Jackson County jury on two counts of statutory rape in the first degree (§ 566.032, RSMo 1994) and four counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree (§ 566.062, RSMo 1994), for which he was sentenced to two consecutive terms of life imprisonment, plus twenty-five years. As the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuehne v. State, 182 S.W.3d 266, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 74, 2006 WL 162700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

182 S.W.3d 266 (Kuehne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kuehne v. Hogan
321 S.W.3d 337 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)