Kuehne & Nagel, Inc. v. Cargo Export Corp.

86 A.D.2d 501, 445 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15012

Opinions

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ostrau, J.), entered January 15, 1981, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, is affirmed, without costs. The failure by plaintiff to bill the tenant for over four years for the taxes now claimed to have been periodically due during this period, and the acceptance of rent which did not include such taxes, raise sufficient questions so that we think it is safer not to grant final judgment on the present affidavits alone and the matter should be explored at a trial. With respect to the rights of the parties as to the one- and one-half month holdover, questions of credibility are presented as to whether there was an oral agreement covering such holdover. Concur — Ross, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuehne & Nagel, Inc. v. Cargo Export Corp., 86 A.D.2d 501, 445 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

86 A.D.2d 501 (Kuehne & Nagel, Inc. v. Cargo Export Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodolitz v. Neptune Paper Prods.
239 N.E.2d 628 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
Raleigh Associates, Inc. v. Henry
99 N.E.2d 289 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Jaybert Esso Service Station, Inc.
30 A.D.2d 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)