Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.

719 A.2d 903, 247 Conn. 909, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 357
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 15, 1998
DocketSC 15994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 719 A.2d 903 (Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co., 719 A.2d 903, 247 Conn. 909, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 357 (Colo. 1998).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 1 (AC 17337), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the decision of the compensation review board that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs appeal because it was untimely, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-301 (a)?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.
738 A.2d 135 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 A.2d 903, 247 Conn. 909, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kudlacz-v-lindberg-heat-treating-co-conn-1998.