Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.

719 A.2d 903, 247 Conn. 909, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 357
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 15, 1998·No. SC 15994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 1 (AC 17337), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the decision of the compensation review board that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs appeal because it was untimely, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-301 (a)?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co., 719 A.2d 903, 247 Conn. 909, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 357 (Colo. 1998).

719 A.2d 903 (Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.
738 A.2d 135 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)