Kuder v. Mary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kuder v. Mary

172 A.D. 900, 156 N.Y.S. 1129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D. 900 (Kuder v. Mary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kuder v. Mary, 172 A.D. 900, 156 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think that the moving affidavit was insufficient to establish a case for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, and for that reason, without passing upon the question of the necessity of making a case, the determination appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Determination affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We think that the moving affidavit was insufficient to establish a case for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, and for that reason, without passing upon the question of the necessity of making a case, the determination appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Determination affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A.D. 900, 156 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuder-v-mary-nyappdiv-1916.