Home/New York Court of Appeals/Kuczka v. Clark

Kuczka v. Clark

445 N.E.2d 204, 58 N.Y.2d 738, 459 N.Y.S.2d 28, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3941
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 1982·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (86 AD2d 980). Nor do we find any basis to disturb the determination implicit in the disposition in that court that appellant’s allegations of delay on the part of respondent commissioner in establishing the civil service list do not provide equitable grounds for the relief that he seeks.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuczka v. Clark, 445 N.E.2d 204, 58 N.Y.2d 738, 459 N.Y.S.2d 28, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3941 (N.Y. 1982).

445 N.E.2d 204 (Kuczka v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Shabazz
622 A.2d 914 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Doyle v. Suffolk County
786 F.2d 523 (Second Circuit, 1986)
John Doyle, Barbara McCuen William T. Milne, Frank Misiano, John J. Presta, Kevin Sweeney, George Lynn, Frederick Slanovec, Chris Innes, and John Considine, for Themselves and for All Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. Suffolk County, Suffolk County Civil Service Commission, and Suffolk County Police Department, and State of New York, Intervenor-Appellee. Rolf Hettinger and Michael J. McConnell v. Nassau County Civil Service Commission, Adele Leonard, as Executive Director of the Nassau County Civil Service Commission, Nassau County Police Department and the County of Nassau, and State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant
786 F.2d 523 (Second Circuit, 1986)