Home/Wisconsin Supreme Court/Kucksdorf v. Industrial Commission

Kucksdorf v. Industrial Commission

37 N.W.2d 791, 254 Wis. 570, 1949 Wisc. LEXIS 262
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 11, 1949
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 N.W.2d 791 (Kucksdorf v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kucksdorf v. Industrial Commission, 37 N.W.2d 791, 254 Wis. 570, 1949 Wisc. LEXIS 262 (Wis. 1949).

Opinions

Rosenberry, C. J.

It is the contention of the appellant that where a sawmill operator has a guard that the Industrial Commission has O.K.’d as satisfactory and where after he had built a new mill and so advised the commission and requested them in writing to make an inspection, it is unreasonable on the part of the commission to find and hold that the guard as approved by the representative of the commission on the prior inspection is now inadequate because a new type guard or slasher swing saw of which the employer had no knowledge, was available.

We fail to find in the record any evidence that the particular type of guard used by the employer had been inspected and approved by a representative of the commission.

The employer testified that this same slasher saw was used in a shingle mill prior to the time that it was set up in the lath mill, and that it operated the same in the lath mill as it did

*572

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Connor Lumber & Land Co. v. Industrial Commission
94 N.W.2d 145 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1959)
Hipke v. Industrial Commission
52 N.W.2d 401 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 N.W.2d 791, 254 Wis. 570, 1949 Wisc. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kucksdorf-v-industrial-commission-wis-1949.