Kucinski, Albert Charles
Opinion
ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS
RANDALL COUNTY
Per curiam. keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) & 9.3(b), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals and the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.
En banc.
Delivered: June 6, 2007
Do Not Publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kucinski, Albert Charles (Kucinski, Albert Charles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.