Kucera v. Moss
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Peter Kucera, Respondent, v.
Ashely Moss, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-001145
Appeal From Greenville County W. Marsh Robertson, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-141 Submitted February 9, 2018 – Filed April 4, 2018
REVERSED
Gwendolynn Wamble Barrett, of Barret Mackenzie, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Peter Kucera, of Greenville, pro se.
PER CURIAM: Reversed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and this court's decision in Kucera v. Moss, Op. No. 2018-UP-140 (S.C. Ct. App. filed April 4, 2018).
REVERSED.1 HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kucera v. Moss (Kucera v. Moss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.