Kucera v. Moss

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedApril 4, 2018
Docket2018-UP-141
StatusUnpublished

This text of Kucera v. Moss (Kucera v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kucera v. Moss, (S.C. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Peter Kucera, Respondent,

v.

Ashely Moss, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001145

Appeal From Greenville County W. Marsh Robertson, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-141 Submitted February 9, 2018 – Filed April 4, 2018

REVERSED

Gwendolynn Wamble Barrett, of Barret Mackenzie, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Peter Kucera, of Greenville, pro se.

PER CURIAM: Reversed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and this court's decision in Kucera v. Moss, Op. No. 2018-UP-140 (S.C. Ct. App. filed April 4, 2018). REVERSED.1

HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kucera v. Moss, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kucera-v-moss-scctapp-2018.