Kucej v. Town of Fairfield, No. Cv93 0306484s (Apr. 26, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 4280
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedApril 26, 1994
DocketNo. CV93 0306484S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 4280 (Kucej v. Town of Fairfield, No. Cv93 0306484s (Apr. 26, 1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kucej v. Town of Fairfield, No. Cv93 0306484s (Apr. 26, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 4280 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This is an action to declare a decision of the Fairfield Zoning Board of Appeals on a variance application by the plaintiffs to be null and void because of improper notice. At the trial the only evidence offered was that the plaintiffs are the owners of the property involved in this action. The claim of lack of proper notice has not been briefed by the plaintiffs. Issues which are raised but not briefed are considered abandoned. Shaw v. Planning Commission, 5 Conn. App. 520, 525. While not required, a review of the brief in the companion case, a zoning appeal, also shows that there is no merit to the claim in this case. A legal notice of a public hearing on the plaintiffs' application was published in a Fairfield newspaper on June 25, 1993 and July 2, 1993 for a public hearing on July 8, 1993. The notice complied with 8-7 of the General Statutes. The plaintiffs complain that the additional posted notice stated a hearing date of July 5, 1993. This notice was not legally required and amounts to personal not statutory notice. While this additional notice may have been misleading, it did not mislead the plaintiffs, who attended or were represented at the public hearing on July 8th. Attendance at the hearing is a waiver of any defect in the notice as to them. See Schwartz v. Hamden, 168 Conn. 8, 15.

Judgment shall enter for the defendants.

ROBERT A. FULLER, JUDGE CT Page 4281

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwartz v. Town of Hamden
357 A.2d 488 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1975)
Shaw v. Planning Commission
500 A.2d 1338 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 4280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kucej-v-town-of-fairfield-no-cv93-0306484s-apr-26-1994-connsuperct-1994.