Kucej v. Kucej, No. Cv92 02 97 91 85 (June 9, 1998)

1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 7297
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided June 9, 1998·No. No. CV92 02 97 91 85·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS #167 Both parties appear to agree that upon death title to real property immediately descends to the heirs or devisees. SeeGoodman v. Bank of Boston, 27 Conn. App. 333, 341 (1992). While there may be claims that the Estate could make in its own right, the plaintiff administratrix identifies the issues as "to whom the property in question belongs" (document # 173 pg. 4). The plaintiff administratrix does not have standing to litigate this issue and if other issues are, in fact, in dispute they shall be more specifically identified.

The Motion to Dismiss is therefore granted.

RUSH, JUDGE CT Page 7298

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kucej v. Kucej, No. Cv92 02 97 91 85 (June 9, 1998), 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 7297 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 7297 (Kucej v. Kucej, No. Cv92 02 97 91 85 (June 9, 1998)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodman v. Bank of Boston Connecticut
606 A.2d 994 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1992)