Kucej v. Kucej, No. Cv92 02 97 91 85 (June 9, 1998)

Connecticut Superior Court

Kucej v. Kucej, No. Cv92 02 97 91 85 (June 9, 1998)

1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 7297

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJune 9, 1998

DocketNo. CV92 02 97 91 85

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 7297 (Kucej v. Kucej, No. Cv92 02 97 91 85 (June 9, 1998)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kucej v. Kucej, No. Cv92 02 97 91 85 (June 9, 1998), 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 7297 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS #167 Both parties appear to agree that upon death title to real property immediately descends to the heirs or devisees. SeeGoodman v. Bank of Boston, 27 Conn. App. 333, 341 (1992). While there may be claims that the Estate could make in its own right, the plaintiff administratrix identifies the issues as "to whom the property in question belongs" (document # 173 pg. 4). The plaintiff administratrix does not have standing to litigate this issue and if other issues are, in fact, in dispute they shall be more specifically identified.

The Motion to Dismiss is therefore granted.

RUSH, JUDGE CT Page 7298

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS #167 Both parties appear to agree that upon death title to real property immediately descends to the heirs or devisees. SeeGoodman v. Bank of Boston, 27 Conn. App. 333, 341 (1992). While there may be claims that the Estate could make in its own right, the plaintiff administratrix identifies the issues as "to whom the property in question belongs" (document # 173 pg. 4). The plaintiff administratrix does not have standing to litigate this issue and if other issues are, in fact, in dispute they shall be more specifically identified.

The Motion to Dismiss is therefore granted.

RUSH, JUDGE CT Page 7298

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 7297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kucej-v-kucej-no-cv92-02-97-91-85-june-9-1998-connsuperct-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack