Kubowicz v. Kubowicz, No. Fa91 0278848 S (Jul. 31, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6661
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided July 31, 1991·No. No. FA91 0278848 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT In their claims for relief the plaintiffs, inter alia, have requested that the mandatory injunction issued against one of the plaintiffs be dissolved.

". . . [C]ourts have inherent power to change or modify their own injunctions where circumstances or pertinent law have so changed as to make it equitable to do so." Dept. of Health Services v. CHRO, 198 Conn. 479, 487 (1986). See also Conservation Commission v. Price, 5 Conn. App. 70, 73 (1985). "Familiar equity procedure assures opportunity for modifying or vacating an injunction when its continuation is no longer CT Page 6662 warranted." Waterbury Hospital v. Conn. Health Care Assoc.,186 Conn. 247, 251 (1982). In Waterbury Hospital "the situation that existed at the time of trial upon which the trial court ordered the injunctive relief no longer exists." Id.

The plaintiffs' complaint alleges a change of circumstances since the mandatory injunction took effect which they claim should induce a court to modify that order. Whether that has in fact occurred is a question of fact and, therefore, the motion for summary judgment must be denied.

LAWRENCE L. HAUSER, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kubowicz v. Kubowicz, No. Fa91 0278848 S (Jul. 31, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6661 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6661 (Kubowicz v. Kubowicz, No. Fa91 0278848 S (Jul. 31, 1991)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waterbury Hospital v. Connecticut Health Care Associates
440 A.2d 310 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1982)
Conservation Commission v. Price
496 A.2d 982 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1985)