Kubicka v. Lynch

631 F. App'x 169
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 26, 2016
DocketNo. 15-1553
StatusPublished

This text of 631 F. App'x 169 (Kubicka v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kubicka v. Lynch, 631 F. App'x 169 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Petitioners Magdalena Kubicka and Ar-kadiusz Gurczak, both natives and citizens of Poland, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying their motion for a continuance or administrative closure. We have reviewed petitioners’ claims and the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion. See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kubicka (B.I.A. Apr. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lendo v. Gonzales
493 F.3d 439 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
631 F. App'x 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kubicka-v-lynch-ca4-2016.