Kubicka v. Lynch

631 F. App'x 169
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2016·No. No. 15-1553·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Petitioners Magdalena Kubicka and Ar-kadiusz Gurczak, both natives and citizens of Poland, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying their motion for a continuance or administrative closure. We have reviewed petitioners’ claims and the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion. See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kubicka (B.I.A. Apr. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kubicka v. Lynch, 631 F. App'x 169 (4th Cir. 2016).

631 F. App'x 169 (Kubicka v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lendo v. Gonzales
493 F.3d 439 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)